Edupunk: Redefining Ed Tech


Edupunk is a neologism for a growing trend among educational technologists who are attempting to restructure the way we use technologies for learning. One of the prevailing themes is that we shy away from using programs that have only one use, or that can only be used within strict confines. Edupunk promotes the use of programs and technologies in new ways; rejecting the adoption of new technologies by corporate interests that have been bundled into cookie-cutter'esque products.

Seemingly, the biggest target of this movement is Blackboard. The omni-present Course Management System, which has become a staple of higher (and more recently, secondary and elementary) education. It is accused of stifling creativity among instructors and students. Due to the fact that Blackboard has a standard layout and form every course looks the same, and is being administered the same way. Due to this, it's difficult to find new and innovative ways to teach.


The DIY attitude of Edupunk seems to be personified in the open source movement. If this is the case, the flagship of the movement would have to be
Moodle; the open source course management system. Since it is open source, instructors and students can personalize the experience, and make it their own. Educators looking to put their own spin on things have taken advantage of Web 2.0 applications like delicio.us, social networking, image sharing using sites like Flickr, and video sharing. The convergence of these tools is meant to create a personal and meaningful experience for students which will result in better retention and deeper interest.

One instructor took Wikipedia and gave his students a seemingly insurmountable goal: create featured articles. Keep in mind that about 0.01% of all Wikipedia articles are able to attain this level of achievement. You can read more about how the instructor created his course and used Wikipedia here

The idea of Edupunk beginning to catch on, with many musing about how exactly we will be able to transform this attitude into something more useful. It's been making its way across the blogosphere and has penetrated the news outlets. Perhaps the lack of clarity in the concept is its strength; allowing others to interpret and create their own definition of what Edupunk is, and how to use it. I'll leave you all with a notable quote and a video I found regarding Edupunk, which I feel embodies the spirit of the idea

I’m going to have my students this Summer do a collaborative project using Drupal because BlackBoard is too closed and they can’t take ownership of the site they’ll create. When I asked the EduBUNK people at my campus for an install, they were like ‘We don’t know that is, therefore you don’t need it. How about a Listserv?’

So I’ll be creating the site and hosting it myself, and the students will take over by the end to make it representative of their research. Universities need to start providing fully capable (i.e. with MySQL, PHP, and whatever else) and BLANK webspace for faculty to do what they want in.

A one-size-fits-all approach with BlackBoard and its ilk is like forcing No Child Left Behind in higher education. Take no account of individual learning styles and creativity, teach only to whatever parameters are handed down, and you got yourself a bunch of passive, lame ducks. Just the kind of citizens we want in this age of abundant technological media.




Related Links:
The Chronicle of Higher Education:
Jim Groom: The Glass Bees
Stephen Downes: Introducing Edupunk

1 comments: Post a Comment
  Unknown

September 22, 2008 at 9:50 PM

Brian,

Wow, I did your blog theme. More than that, you really nail edupunk in those first two paragraph. You frame it beautifully. As for Moodle as the flagship applications, I'm sure it's the tool of choice of many, and I think it has some real value. But I think it's m old as a CMS/LMS is one of its greatest weaknesses. Why not just a blog, or a whole series of blogs in a multi-user setup? I guess this is splitting hairs and my own beef, but I find CMS/LMSs in general odious, for they all follow the same design of control and aesthetic neutrality.